Site Search
Use small fonts Use medium fonts Use large fonts Email link to page


Related people 1
Frank Robinson Frank Robinson
t: 416 869 5991
Email Frank Robinson email
Derek Ronde Derek Ronde
t: 416 869 5428
Email Derek Ronde email
Geoffrey B. Shaw Geoffrey B. Shaw
t: 416 869 5982
Email Geoffrey B. Shaw email
Larry M. Weinberg Larry M. Weinberg
t: 416 860 2987
Email Larry M. Weinberg email


Related people 2
Carly Cohen Carly Cohen
t: 416 869 5368
Email Carly Cohen email
Stefanie Holland Stefanie Holland
t: 416 860 6467
Email Stefanie Holland email
Christopher Horkins Christopher Horkins
t: 416 815 4351
Email Christopher Horkins email
Noah Leszcz Noah Leszcz
t: 416 869 5360
Email Noah Leszcz email
Eric Mayzel Eric Mayzel
t: 416 860 6448
Email Eric Mayzel email
Colin Pendrith Colin Pendrith
t: 416 860 6765
Email Colin Pendrith email
Rebecca Valo Rebecca Valo
t: 416 860 6885
Email Rebecca Valo email

Franchise Top Tips Graphic





10/06/2016 British Columbia Releases Regulations for Franchises Act
10/06/2016 Supreme Court of Canada Delivers the Final Word on Pet Valu Class Action
09/29/2016 Ontario Court Imposes New Disclosure Requirement Prohibiting the Common Practice of Determining Location After Signing a Franchise Agreement
08/12/2016 ‘Changing Workplaces Review' Interim Report May Have Significant Implications for Franchisors and Franchisees
06/17/2016 Ontario to Permit Electronic Delivery of Franchise Disclosure Documents Starting July 1, 2016
04/13/2016 Franchise Law e-COMMUNIQUÉ - April 2016
  1. Ontario Releases Regulation under Healthy Menu Choices Act, and Franchisors Are At Risk!
  2. Alberta Government Canvasses Input on Franchise Disclosure Financial Statement Exemption Requirement
  3. Ontario Court of Appeal Shakes Up The Issue of Restrictive Covenant Enforceability
02/19/2016 Franchise Law e-COMMUNIQUÉ - February 2016
  1. A New Year or New Fiscal Year - Your Canadian Franchise Disclosure Document Needs Updating!
  2. Court of Appeal Dismisses Pet Valu Class Action and Puts a Leash on the Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing
  3. Update: “Saab Story” Has A Plot Twist: Ontario Court of Appeal Overturns Dealer Litigation Jurisdiction Ruling Due To Reasonable Apprehension of Bias
  4. Franchisee’s Summary Judgment Motion Spoiled After Court Finds Spoliation of Evidence
  5. Dakin Care of Business: What Not To Do When Managing Franchise Transfers and Disclosure
  6. What We’re Up To (Spring and Summer 2016)
01/15/2016 Court of Appeal Dismisses Pet Valu Class Action and Puts a Leash on the Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing
12/02/2015 Franchise Law e-COMMUNIQUÉ - December 2015
  1. British Columbia Becomes the 6th Canadian Province to Pass Franchise Legislation – The Franchises Act
  2. Ontario Government Releases Draft Regulations For Healthy Menu Choices Act
  3. No Bridges to U.S. for Addison Chevrolet: Good Faith Claims Against G.M. and U.S. Parent Struck in Action by Retained Dealers
  4. The Cherry On Top: Ontario Court of Appeal Dismisses Caffe Demetre Appeal
  5. Ontario Court Enforces Restrictive Covenant In Franchise Case
  6. Franchisee’s Action Fried: Notice Requirements Do Not Automatically Arise Out of the Duty of Good Faith
  7. There is No “Franchisee’s Associate”: Ontario Court Finds that Shareholders of a Master Franchisee Were Not “Granted” a Franchise for the Purposes of the Wishart Act
  8. What We’re Up To
10/06/2015 Coast to Coast Disclosure: Franchise Legislation Comes to British Columbia
10/06/2015 Ontario Government Releases Draft Regulations for Healthy Menu Choices Act
07/10/2015 Former Dealers Unsuccessful With Franchise Law Claims in Class Action Against General Motors of Canada Limited
05/08/2015 Ontario's Proposed Menu Labelling Law - Government Listens and Changes Law to Protect Franchisors from Liability
04/28/2015 Changes to the Rules for Personal Guarantees of Franchise Agreements in Alberta
04/09/2015 Franchise Law e-COMMUNIQUÉ - April 2015
  1. Ontario Court of Appeal Upholds Springdale Decision and Finds Franchisor Not Necessarily Exempt From Disclosure in Resale of Existing Franchise
  2. Franchise Litigation Parties Cannot Use the Appellate Court as a Way to Re-Litigate Findings of Fact Regarding Materiality
  3. “Saab Stories” for Franchisor Seeking to Oust Ontario Jurisdiction Over Canada-Wide Group Action
  4. Concise Drafting Matters: Ontario Court Grants Partial Summary Judgment Dismissing Significant Portions of a Franchisee’s “Kitchen Sink” Claim
  5. What We’re Up To (Spring and Summer 2015)
01/14/2015 Franchise Law e-COMMUNIQUÉ - January 2015
  1. Let’s Arbitrate: Arbitration Clauses as a Tool For Avoiding Class Proceedings
  2. It’s That Time of Year: Does Your Canadian Franchise Disclosure Document Need Updating?
  3. The Top Ten Franchise Law Cases and Developments of 2014
  4. Do the Math: Ontario Court Declares That Franchisee is Not an Employee
  5. What We’re Up To (Winter/Spring 2015)